Back to Uttar Pradesh 1991 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 363 · 1991
Mathura
Winner — 1991
RAVIKANT GARG
BJP· BJP
BJP 47.9%INC 24.7%34 others 27.4%
Votes
45,753
47.9% share
Winning margin
22,207
23.3% of votes
Total candidates
36
Turnout
44.5%
of 2,14,675
Mathura is a safe seat — RAVIKANT GARG won by 23.3%.
Seat history
All Candidates
36 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAVIKANT GARG | BJP | 45,753 | 47.9% |
| 2 | PRADEEP MATHUR | INC | 23,546 | 24.7% |
| 3 | NARENDRA SINGH | Janata Dal | 18,214 | 19.1% |
| 4 | JAY PRAKASH YADAV | JP | 2,758 | 2.9% |
| 5 | RAMJI LAL | 1,887 | 2.0% | |
| 6 | POORAN | IND | 623 | 0.7% |
| 7 | BHOOPENDRAS | IND | 418 | 0.4% |
| 8 | HARI OM | IND | 293 | 0.3% |
| 9 | SURESH | IND | 232 | 0.2% |
| 10 | RATAN LAL | UPRP | 225 | 0.2% |
| 11 | RAGHU RAJ SINGH | IND | 182 | 0.2% |
| 12 | RAJESH KUMAR ALIAS RAJA RAM | IND | 158 | 0.2% |
| 13 | SWAMI NATH | IND | 151 | 0.2% |
| 14 | SHYAM | IND | 125 | 0.1% |
| 15 | SHRI KRISHAN | IND | 95 | 0.1% |
| 16 | RAMAN LAL | IND | 95 | 0.1% |
| 17 | JUGAL KISHOR | IND | 81 | 0.1% |
| 18 | BALKISHAN | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 19 | NISAT AHMAD | IND | 68 | 0.1% |
| 20 | NETRAPAL | IND | 58 | 0.1% |
| 21 | MOHAN SINGH |  FBL | 58 | 0.1% |
| 22 | RAJJO | IND | 58 | 0.1% |
| 23 | RAM SUMIRAN | 56 | 0.1% | |
| 24 | SANTOSH KUMAR | IND | 33 | 0.0% |
| 25 | BHEEM SEN | IND | 32 | 0.0% |
| 26 | VEERENDRA PARTAP | IND | 27 | 0.0% |
| 27 | SOORAJ BHAN SHARMA | IND | 27 | 0.0% |
| 28 | PADAMNABH | IND | 23 | 0.0% |
| 29 | VEERENDRA CHATURVEDI | IND | 23 | 0.0% |
| 30 | REENA | IND | 18 | 0.0% |
| 31 | RAM BABU | IND | 17 | 0.0% |
| 32 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 15 | 0.0% |
| 33 | BRIJENDRA SINGH | IND | 14 | 0.0% |
| 34 | AAU | IND | 11 | 0.0% |
| 35 | BHAGWAN SINGH | IND | 9 | 0.0% |
| 36 | JAY KARAN MAHAWAR | IND | 8 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (398th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean23.3%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.5% · min 0.4% · max 26.7%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
48%
lowerhigher
398th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.30
fewer partiesmore parties
33rd of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.1%
lowerhigher
38th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
419 seats · 210 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.30EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 47.9%INC 24.7%JD 19.1%OTH 8.3%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
32,39,774
Density
1087 / km²
Sex ratio
937 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,981 km²
SC population15.3%
ST population3.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
93%HINDU
Hindu 92.7%Muslim 6.6%Other 0.7%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water15.5%
Electricity24.9%
Sanitation25.9%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births90.0%
Children fully vaccinated62.2%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.8%
Children underweight (under 5)42.5%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER52.2%
Women literate70.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER9.9%
Clean cooking fuel53.8%
Health insurance10.6%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Bindi (Tikuli)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.