Back to Madhya Pradesh 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 162 · 1990
Durg
Winner — 1990
MOTI LAL VORA
INC· INC
INC 51.9%JD 38.2%27 others 9.9%
Votes
59,924
51.9% share
Winning margin
15,789
13.7% of votes
Total candidates
29
Turnout
57.7%
of 2,00,349
A clear win with a 13.7% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
29 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOTI LAL VORA | INC | 59,924 | 51.9% |
| 2 | PRADEEP CHOUBEY | National Front | 44,135 | 38.2% |
| 3 | BISE YADAV | IND | 6,136 | 5.3% |
| 4 | JEORAKHAN LAL BHANDEKAR | IND | 1,023 | 0.9% |
| 5 | NARESH VERMA | IND | 553 | 0.5% |
| 6 | RAJESH KUMAR | IND | 469 | 0.4% |
| 7 | SATISH AKOJWAR | IND | 464 | 0.4% |
| 8 | VINOD GOVIND | ICS(SCS) | 368 | 0.3% |
| 9 | MAHADEO CHANDRA PATNAYAK | IND | 293 | 0.3% |
| 10 | JAGAT KUKREJA | IND | 248 | 0.2% |
| 11 | PANCH RAM SATNAMI | IND | 234 | 0.2% |
| 12 | PRABHU RAM DESHLAHRE | IND | 200 | 0.2% |
| 13 | RAVINDRA DUBEY | IND | 183 | 0.2% |
| 14 | UMA PRASAD | 169 | 0.1% | |
| 15 | RAMESH | IND | 157 | 0.1% |
| 16 | SAGAR SINGH MANDAVI | IND | 133 | 0.1% |
| 17 | GANGADHAR | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 18 | GIRJANAND CHANDRAKER | IND | 89 | 0.1% |
| 19 | SOMNATH MISHRA | LKD(B) | 79 | 0.1% |
| 20 | VINOD KUMAR GUPTA | IND | 77 | 0.1% |
| 21 | BHAGAT RAO DONGRE | IND | 77 | 0.1% |
| 22 | ANIL DAS | IND | 66 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SUBHASH GUPTA | IND | 60 | 0.1% |
| 24 | SOMAJI KUNWER LAL DBOMNE | IND | 57 | 0.1% |
| 25 | JOHAL RAM SAHU | IND | 50 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HAFIJ KAMALUDDIN | IND | 50 | 0.0% |
| 27 | DHAN SINGH | IND | 49 | 0.0% |
| 28 | IMTIYAJ ALI | IND | 45 | 0.0% |
| 29 | KULDEEP SINGH RAJPUROHIT | IND | 32 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (53rd), a typical margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe13.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 18.1% · min 1.1% · max 51.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
84%
lowerhigher
53rd of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.16
fewer partiesmore parties
153rd of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
104th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
320 seats · 161 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.16EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 51.9%JD 38.2%IND 5.3%OTH 4.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
15,45,814
Density
251 / km²
Sex ratio
956 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
6,153 km²
SC population19.1%
ST population3.5%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
93%HINDU
Hindu 92.8%Muslim 6.9%Other 0.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water13.0%
Electricity67.6%
Sanitation15.9%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births91.7%
Children fully vaccinated71.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER27.6%
Children underweight (under 5)26.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER52.3%
Women literate52.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER46.0%
Clean cooking fuel24.8%
Health insurance27.1%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏷️OrangeGI
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.