Narnaul
Winner — 1991
Narnaul is a safe seat — PHUSA RAM won by 26.6%.
All Candidates
15 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHUSA RAM | INC | 29,366 | 42.8% |
| 2 | UDMI RAM | JP | 11,123 | 16.2% |
| 3 | HOSHIAR SINGH | HVP | 9,964 | 14.5% |
| 4 | KAILASH CHAND | BJP | 9,083 | 13.3% |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | IND | 2,331 | 3.4% |
| 6 | SATYA NARAIN | IND | 2,200 | 3.2% |
| 7 | HARI RAM | IND | 2,049 | 3.0% |
| 8 | ATTAR SINGH | SJJP | 934 | 1.4% |
| 9 | DINESH KUMAR | 505 | 0.7% | |
| 10 | JODHA RAM | IND | 250 | 0.4% |
| 11 | SANT LAL | IND | 207 | 0.3% |
| 12 | JAGDISH PARSAD | IND | 179 | 0.3% |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 156 | 0.2% |
| 14 | RADHEY SHYAM | VHP | 111 | 0.2% |
| 15 | RAM SARAN | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (85th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
3 locationsMughal Bridge over the Buddhia wala Nala
Mughal Bridge over the Buddhia wala Nala
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.