Narnaul
Winner — 1987
Narnaul is a safe seat — KAILASH CHAND SHARMA won by 29.7%.
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH CHAND SHARMA | BJP | 42,629 | 59.6% |
| 2 | PHUSA RAM | INC | 21,386 | 29.9% |
| 3 | RAM NIVAS | Janata | 1,575 | 2.2% |
| 4 | OMKAR SINGH | LKD(A) | 1,217 | 1.7% |
| 5 | RAO SURAT SINGH | IND | 1,096 | 1.5% |
| 6 | ARUN KUMAR YADAV | IND | 1,063 | 1.5% |
| 7 | RAJINDER | IND | 865 | 1.2% |
| 8 | NAR SINGH | IND | 484 | 0.7% |
| 9 | RADHEY SHYAM | IND | 239 | 0.3% |
| 10 | THAWAR SINGH YADAV | IND | 234 | 0.3% |
| 11 | RAJENDER SINGH YADAV | IND | 177 | 0.3% |
| 12 | HARIRAM BHARGHAR | IND | 144 | 0.2% |
| 13 | BALBIR SINGH ARYA | IND | 125 | 0.2% |
| 14 | RAO PRABHU SINGH | IND | 110 | 0.1% |
| 15 | SAME SINGH VIRODHI | IND | 102 | 0.1% |
| 16 | RATI RAM | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (85th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
3 locationsMughal Bridge over the Buddhia wala Nala
Mughal Bridge over the Buddhia wala Nala
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.