Back to Assam 1991 map
Assam · Assembly Constituency 91 · 1991
Hojai
Winner — 1991
ARDHENDU KUMAR DEY
INC· INC
INC 41.7%BJP 22.6%14 others 35.7%
Votes
32,481
41.7% share
Winning margin
14,850
19.1% of votes
Total candidates
16
Turnout
71.3%
of 1,09,289
Hojai is a safe seat — ARDHENDU KUMAR DEY won by 19.1%.
Seat history
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARDHENDU KUMAR DEY | INC | 32,481 | 41.7% |
| 2 | SIKHA SUR CHOUDHURY | BJP | 17,631 | 22.6% |
| 3 | IDRISH ALI FAKIR | UMF | 11,452 | 14.7% |
| 4 | KAMAL DUTTA | 8,728 | 11.2% | |
| 5 | NANDA KISHORE SARMA | NAGP | 4,192 | 5.4% |
| 6 | NIRANJAN BHADRA | Janata Dal | 956 | 1.2% |
| 7 | BISHNU SARMA | ICS(SCS) | 358 | 0.5% |
| 8 | RISH DEO KAIRI | 336 | 0.4% | |
| 9 | BARADA KANTA ROY | IND | 309 | 0.4% |
| 10 | JANMEJOY DAS | IND | 293 | 0.4% |
| 11 | MONI SINGH | IND | 264 | 0.3% |
| 12 | RABINDER KUMAR RATH | IND | 237 | 0.3% |
| 13 | ABDUL SALAM | SLP | 221 | 0.3% |
| 14 | TAFAZUL HUSSAIN | IND | 173 | 0.2% |
| 15 | BIMALA PRASAD TALUKDAR | IND | 156 | 0.2% |
| 16 | ALO RANI DEVI | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (103rd), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe19.1%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 23.1% · min 3.7% · max 64.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
81%
lowerhigher
103rd of 126How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.18
fewer partiesmore parties
51st of 126How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.6%
lowerhigher
35th of 126Where does the house stand?
SEAT
126 seats · 64 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.18EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 41.7%BJP 22.6%UMF 14.7%AGP 11.2%NAGP 5.4%OTH 4.3%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDThis seat number was reused from 2026. The district and local data on file describe the seat as contested from 2026, so they are not shown for earlier elections.