Back to Uttar Pradesh 1993 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 355 · 1993Reserved (SC)
Etmadpur
Winner — 1993
CHANDRA BHAN MAURYA
SP· SP-BSP alliance ('Mile Mulayam-Kanshi Ram'), Uttar Pradesh 1993
SP 40.4%BJP 39.8%27 others 19.8%
Votes
39,468
40.4% share
Winning margin
643
0.7% of votes
Total candidates
29
Turnout
44.4%
of 2,19,791
Etmadpur was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.7% — fewer than 643 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
29 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHANDRA BHAN MAURYA | SP-BSP alliance ('Mile Mulayam-Kanshi Ram'), Uttar Pradesh 1993 | 39,468 | 40.4% |
| 2 | GHANSHYAM PREMI | BJP | 38,825 | 39.8% |
| 3 | SHIV CHARAN LAL MANAV | Janata Dal | 9,891 | 10.1% |
| 4 | PRABHU DAYAL | INC | 4,776 | 4.9% |
| 5 | LAYAK SINGH BODDHA | 1,089 | 1.1% | |
| 6 | MAKKHAN LAL VAIDYA | 815 | 0.8% | |
| 7 | RAM HARI | JP | 729 | 0.8% |
| 8 | PAPPU ALIAS SWAMISARAN | IND | 466 | 0.5% |
| 9 | CHHOTE LAL | IND | 261 | 0.3% |
| 10 | KHET PAL | IND | 145 | 0.1% |
| 11 | MEGH SINGH S/O MOJI RAM | 144 | 0.1% | |
| 12 | CHHAGAN LAL ALIAS CHHADAMI LAL | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 13 | GOPI CHAND | IND | 103 | 0.1% |
| 14 | JAIVIR | IND | 89 | 0.1% |
| 15 | MADAN LAL AYELA | ICS | 86 | 0.1% |
| 16 | SHAMBHU DAYAL | IND | 72 | 0.1% |
| 17 | HAR NARAIN | IND | 70 | 0.1% |
| 18 | ATAR SINGH | IND | 68 | 0.1% |
| 19 | RAJVIR | IND | 54 | 0.1% |
| 20 | KAMAL SINGH | IND | 53 | 0.1% |
| 21 | RAJENDRA KUMAR | IND | 52 | 0.1% |
| 22 | SUGAR SINGH | IND | 47 | 0.1% |
| 23 | VIRENDRA KUMAR | IND | 45 | 0.1% |
| 24 | MEGH SINGH S/O GNAGA RAM | IND | 44 | 0.1% |
| 25 | SURESH CHANDRA TETRIYA | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
| 26 | KISHORI LAL GIHAR | IND | 26 | 0.0% |
| 27 | RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM | IND | 24 | 0.0% |
| 28 | DEV KUMAR | IND | 19 | 0.0% |
| 29 | KESHI DAS | IND | 16 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (225th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean0.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 10.2% · min 0.3% · max 40.6%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
60%
lowerhigher
225th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.10
fewer partiesmore parties
77th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.7%
lowerhigher
176th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
422 seats · 212 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.10EFFECTIVE PARTIES
SP 40.4%BJP 39.8%JD 10.1%OTH 9.7%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,05,968
Density
1288 / km²
Sex ratio
979 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,713 km²
SC population21.5%
ST population1.0%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
80%HINDU
Hindu 80.2%Muslim 19.4%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water13.1%
Electricity46.7%
Sanitation27.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births94.7%
Children fully vaccinated59.1%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.4%
Children underweight (under 5)30.3%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER44.3%
Women literate72.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.0%
Clean cooking fuel54.2%
Health insurance16.0%
What's nearby?
2 locationsSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Powerloom Textile
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.