Back to Uttar Pradesh 1993 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 314 · 1993
Mohammdabad
Winner — 1993
CHANDRA BHOSHAN SINGH ALIAS MUNNU BABU
BJP· BJP
BJP 37.4%INC 27.7%32 others 35.0%
Votes
47,955
37.4% share
Winning margin
12,447
9.7% of votes
Total candidates
34
Turnout
59.0%
of 2,17,511
A clear win with a 9.7% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
34 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHANDRA BHOSHAN SINGH ALIAS MUNNU BABU | BJP | 47,955 | 37.4% |
| 2 | NARENDRA SINGH YADAV | INC | 35,508 | 27.7% |
| 3 | RAM SEVAK SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 29,437 | 22.9% |
| 4 | SURESH CHANDRA SINGH | Janata Dal | 8,625 | 6.7% |
| 5 | RAKESH SINGH | IND | 1,193 | 0.9% |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR KASYP | JP | 580 | 0.5% |
| 7 | MAKRAND | 504 | 0.4% | |
| 8 | SHIV DAYAL VERMA | IND | 475 | 0.4% |
| 9 | PRAMOD KUMAR | IND | 360 | 0.3% |
| 10 | AVDHESH SINGH BHADAHRIA | BMSM | 312 | 0.2% |
| 11 | ABHILAKH | IND | 282 | 0.2% |
| 12 | RAMVEER S/O SUNDER | IND | 227 | 0.2% |
| 13 | NARESH SINGH | IND | 220 | 0.2% |
| 14 | JAGDISH | IND | 219 | 0.2% |
| 15 | NAGENDRA SINGH | IND | 209 | 0.2% |
| 16 | NARESH SINGH ALIAS NARENDRA SINGH | IND | 208 | 0.2% |
| 17 | SATYA PRAKASH | IND | 203 | 0.2% |
| 18 | SADANAND | IND | 162 | 0.1% |
| 19 | MOH. SAMSHUL ISLAM | IND | 159 | 0.1% |
| 20 | SATYA VEER SINGH | IND | 158 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UMESH CHANDRA | IND | 156 | 0.1% |
| 22 | NATTHU LAL | IND | 151 | 0.1% |
| 23 | DHEERENDRA SINGH | IND | 143 | 0.1% |
| 24 | RAM DAS ALIAS RAM DAR SAGAR | IND | 131 | 0.1% |
| 25 | DINESH KUMAR | IND | 112 | 0.1% |
| 26 | SONE LAL | IND | 98 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAM VEER S/O SEETARAM | IND | 94 | 0.1% |
| 28 | RAJEEV KUMAR | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 29 | KOUSLENDRA YADAV | IND | 79 | 0.1% |
| 30 | KOUSAL KISHORE | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 31 | JAGGI SINGH ALIAS JANG SINGH | IND | 56 | 0.0% |
| 32 | AJAY PAL SINGH | IND | 55 | 0.0% |
| 33 | KAILMENDRA SINGH ALIAS KOUSLENDRA SINGH | IND | 49 | 0.0% |
| 34 | KAILASH SINGH | IND | 35 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (331st), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean9.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 15.0% · min 0.4% · max 71.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
56%
lowerhigher
331st of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.36
fewer partiesmore parties
27th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
94th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
422 seats · 212 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.36EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 37.4%INC 27.7%SP 22.9%JD 6.7%OTH 5.3%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
17,15,183
Density
1042 / km²
Sex ratio
972 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,646 km²
SC population21.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
76%HINDU
Hindu 75.8%Muslim 23.6%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water35.6%
Electricity30.8%
Sanitation15.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births90.6%
Children fully vaccinated80.2%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER42.3%
Children underweight (under 5)34.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.5%
Women literate61.3%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER16.8%
Clean cooking fuel58.1%
Health insurance20.4%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Brass Utensils🏺Hosiery Products
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.