Back to Uttar Pradesh 1993 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 313 · 1993
Kaimganj
Winner — 1993
PRATAP SINGH YADAV
SP· SP-BSP alliance ('Mile Mulayam-Kanshi Ram'), Uttar Pradesh 1993
SP 26.8%BJP 24.2%25 others 49.1%
Votes
35,558
26.8% share
Winning margin
3,407
2.6% of votes
Total candidates
27
Turnout
60.2%
of 2,20,759
A closely fought contest. PRATAP SINGH YADAV won with a 2.6% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
27 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRATAP SINGH YADAV | SP-BSP alliance ('Mile Mulayam-Kanshi Ram'), Uttar Pradesh 1993 | 35,558 | 26.8% |
| 2 | SUSHEEL SHAKYA | BJP | 32,151 | 24.2% |
| 3 | IZHAR ALAM | Janata Dal | 23,268 | 17.5% |
| 4 | FAKEERE LAL VERMA | INC | 19,130 | 14.4% |
| 5 | RAVINDRA SINGH | IND | 12,742 | 9.6% |
| 6 | VIRENDRA SINGH GANGWAR | IND | 5,100 | 3.8% |
| 7 | KAILASH CHANDRA | JP | 1,113 | 0.8% |
| 8 | MAUJI LAL | 399 | 0.3% | |
| 9 | YADURAJ SINGH | IND | 372 | 0.3% |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD NAWAJ KHAN | IND | 371 | 0.3% |
| 11 | JAGDEESH | IND | 292 | 0.2% |
| 12 | PEEYUSH KUMAR | IND | 255 | 0.2% |
| 13 | CHANDRASEN | IND | 244 | 0.2% |
| 14 | DINESH | IND | 208 | 0.2% |
| 15 | PRAMOD KUMAR | IND | 207 | 0.2% |
| 16 | SOBARAM SINGH YADAV | BLMD | 194 | 0.1% |
| 17 | GREESH CHANDRA | IND | 171 | 0.1% |
| 18 | RAM NARAYAN | IND | 163 | 0.1% |
| 19 | SHYAM SINGH YADAV | IND | 155 | 0.1% |
| 20 | VINOD KUMAR YADAV | IND | 147 | 0.1% |
| 21 | SUBEDAR SINGH CHITTAURI | IND | 137 | 0.1% |
| 22 | HARI OM | IND | 115 | 0.1% |
| 23 | RAM SANEHI | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 24 | RAVENDRA SINGH | IND | 94 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAM DAS | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 26 | MAURY SHREE | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAM CHANDRA | IND | 44 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (354th), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
marginal2.6%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 7.8% · min 0.8% · max 20.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
54%
lowerhigher
354th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
4.41
fewer partiesmore parties
1st of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.5%
lowerhigher
292nd of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
422 seats · 212 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
4.41EFFECTIVE PARTIES
SP 26.8%BJP 24.2%JD 17.5%INC 14.4%IND 9.6%OTH 7.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
17,15,183
Density
1042 / km²
Sex ratio
972 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,646 km²
SC population21.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
76%HINDU
Hindu 75.8%Muslim 23.6%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water35.6%
Electricity30.8%
Sanitation15.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births90.6%
Children fully vaccinated80.2%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER42.3%
Children underweight (under 5)34.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.5%
Women literate61.3%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER16.8%
Clean cooking fuel58.1%
Health insurance20.4%
What's nearby?
2 locationsSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Brass Utensils🏺Hosiery Products
⭐
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.