Back to Uttar Pradesh 1993 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 292 · 1993
Kalyanpur
Winner — 1993
PREM LATA KATIYAR
BJP· BJP
BJP 50.5%INC 23.7%32 others 25.8%
Votes
67,395
50.5% share
Winning margin
35,751
26.8% of votes
Total candidates
34
Turnout
52.7%
of 2,53,411
Kalyanpur is a safe seat — PREM LATA KATIYAR won by 26.8%.
Seat history
All Candidates
34 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PREM LATA KATIYAR | BJP | 67,395 | 50.5% |
| 2 | RAGENDRA SWAROOP | INC | 31,644 | 23.7% |
| 3 | JOGENDRA SINGH | 22,258 | 16.7% | |
| 4 | MAHENDRA SINGH CHANDEL | Janata Dal | 7,984 | 6.0% |
| 5 | DAVARSHI SHARMA | IND | 949 | 0.7% |
| 6 | RAM PHAL SINGH | IND | 565 | 0.4% |
| 7 | RAJ SIROMANI SINGH | IND | 346 | 0.3% |
| 8 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA |  FBL | 249 | 0.2% |
| 9 | SHEEL CHAUHAN | IND | 229 | 0.2% |
| 10 | RAM KEWAL NISHAD | 185 | 0.1% | |
| 11 | RAJIV KUMAR | IND | 169 | 0.1% |
| 12 | SAROJ | JP | 169 | 0.1% |
| 13 | PREMA DEVI | IND | 159 | 0.1% |
| 14 | RAVINDRA SINGH | IND | 127 | 0.1% |
| 15 | ASHOK KUMAR YADAV | IND | 118 | 0.1% |
| 16 | SHYAM NATH | IND | 108 | 0.1% |
| 17 | MAHABEER PRASAD KATHERIA | IND | 98 | 0.1% |
| 18 | PRAM PRAKASH | IND | 82 | 0.1% |
| 19 | NIRMAL KUMAR | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 20 | BHAGWAT SINGH AZAD | IND | 65 | 0.1% |
| 21 | NEERAJ CHATURVEDI | IND | 64 | 0.1% |
| 22 | SHYAM KATIYAR | IND | 59 | 0.0% |
| 23 | RAM PRASAD | IND | 58 | 0.0% |
| 24 | RAMA KANT S/O GANGA SAGAR | IND | 56 | 0.0% |
| 25 | VINOD | IND | 50 | 0.0% |
| 26 | SANTOSH KUMAR | IND | 48 | 0.0% |
| 27 | RAMA KANT S/O SUKH LAL | IND | 47 | 0.0% |
| 28 | SURESH CHANDRA BAJPAI | IND | 37 | 0.0% |
| 29 | SHAHAJAHAN BEGUM KHAN | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
| 30 | HARISH CHANDRA MISRA | IND | 25 | 0.0% |
| 31 | SUJEET | IND | 23 | 0.0% |
| 32 | AWADH NARAIN | IND | 22 | 0.0% |
| 33 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 11 | 0.0% |
| 34 | MANOJ KUMAR BHATIA | IND | 10 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (385th), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean26.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.6% · min 1.2% · max 32.4%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
52%
lowerhigher
385th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.12
fewer partiesmore parties
69th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
79th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
422 seats · 212 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.12EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 50.5%INC 23.7%BSP 16.7%JD 6.0%OTH 3.2%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
21,48,665
Density
642 / km²
Sex ratio
928 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
3,349 km²
SC population12.9%
ST population1.2%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
62%HINDU
Hindu 62.0%Muslim 37.5%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water26.8%
Electricity17.9%
Sanitation15.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births69.7%
Children fully vaccinated57.4%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER41.2%
Children underweight (under 5)37.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER53.7%
Women literate43.2%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER35.0%
Clean cooking fuel39.6%
Health insurance13.0%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Food Processing (Pulses)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.