Back to Uttar Pradesh 1991 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 298 · 1991
Chaubepur
Winner — 1991
SOM NATH SHUKLA
BJP· BJP
BJP 29.3%JP 27.1%26 others 43.5%
Votes
26,445
29.4% share
Winning margin
2,003
2.2% of votes
Total candidates
28
Turnout
49.3%
of 1,82,809
A closely fought contest. SOM NATH SHUKLA won with a 2.2% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
28 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOM NATH SHUKLA | BJP | 26,445 | 29.4% |
| 2 | HARI KISHAN | JP | 24,442 | 27.1% |
| 3 | SONEY LAL PATEL | 18,424 | 20.4% | |
| 4 | BUDDHA LAL VERMA | Janata Dal | 12,362 | 13.7% |
| 5 | RAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI | INC | 3,497 | 3.9% |
| 6 | DEVENDRA | 1,005 | 1.1% | |
| 7 | NARESH MISHRA | IND | 505 | 0.6% |
| 8 | RAJENDRA PRASAD | IND | 377 | 0.4% |
| 9 | VISHWA NATH | IND | 361 | 0.4% |
| 10 | RAM BABU S/O KANHIYA LAL | IND | 337 | 0.4% |
| 11 | PREM NARAYAN | IND | 328 | 0.4% |
| 12 | SHIV SHANKER | IND | 214 | 0.2% |
| 13 | RAJ KUMAR | IND | 214 | 0.2% |
| 14 | DEO NARAYAN | IND | 170 | 0.2% |
| 15 | RAN BABU S/O CHANDAN SINGH | IND | 162 | 0.2% |
| 16 | PAWAN KUMAR | IND | 155 | 0.2% |
| 17 | VIJAI PRAKASH AGNIHOTRI | IND | 149 | 0.2% |
| 18 | RAM KRISHNA TIWARI | IND | 141 | 0.2% |
| 19 | RAJ NARAYAN | IND | 134 | 0.1% |
| 20 | JODHA RAM | IND | 116 | 0.1% |
| 21 | SRI GUL KHAN AZAD | SOP(L) | 95 | 0.1% |
| 22 | VIMLA YADAV | MDL | 90 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SHIVA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 24 | LAXMI NARAYAN YADAV | IND | 84 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAMESHWAR | 74 | 0.1% | |
| 26 | OM PRAKASH | IND | 69 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAISH AHMAD | IND | 39 | 0.0% |
| 28 | BHOODHAR NARAYAN MISHRA | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (262nd), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean2.2%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.9% · min 0.8% · max 41.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
59%
lowerhigher
262nd of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.21
fewer partiesmore parties
383rd of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.2%
lowerhigher
22nd of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
419 seats · 210 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.21EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 29.4%JP 27.1%BSP 20.4%JD 13.7%OTH 9.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
34,33,919
Density
858 / km²
Sex ratio
922 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,003 km²
SC population15.5%
ST population0.0%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
80%HINDU
Hindu 79.8%Muslim 19.8%Other 0.5%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water35.1%
Electricity19.4%
Sanitation12.5%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births81.8%
Children fully vaccinated59.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER45.9%
Children underweight (under 5)28.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.3%
Women literate57.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.4%
Clean cooking fuel56.2%
Health insurance13.4%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Food Processing (Pulses)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.