Back to Madhya Pradesh 1993 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 66 · 1993
Rewa
Winner — 1993
PUSHRAJ SINGH
INC· INC
INC 37.2%BJP 27.4%30 others 35.4%
Votes
34,210
37.2% share
Winning margin
9,053
9.8% of votes
Total candidates
32
Turnout
54.1%
of 1,69,900
A clear win with a 9.8% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PUSHRAJ SINGH | INC | 34,210 | 37.2% |
| 2 | RAJENDRA PANDEY | BJP | 25,157 | 27.4% |
| 3 | MOHD. SHAKOOR DALWALE | 16,839 | 18.3% | |
| 4 | RAM SINGH | Janata Dal | 8,380 | 9.1% |
| 5 | PREM LAL MISHRA | Left | 2,653 | 2.9% |
| 6 | JAMALUDDIN SIDDIQUI | IND | 708 | 0.8% |
| 7 | SANT KUMAR | IND | 501 | 0.5% |
| 8 | RAMANUJ SONDHIYA | IND | 441 | 0.5% |
| 9 | NAGENDRA SINGH | IND | 283 | 0.3% |
| 10 | SANJAY KUMAR NIGAM | 248 | 0.3% | |
| 11 | RAMGARIB KOL | IND | 244 | 0.3% |
| 12 | RAMESH | IND | 240 | 0.3% |
| 13 | GOVIND RUPANI | IND | 197 | 0.2% |
| 14 | DURGESH KUMAR | IND | 193 | 0.2% |
| 15 | SURYAMANI | IND | 172 | 0.2% |
| 16 | FATTELAL NAMDEO | IND | 170 | 0.2% |
| 17 | GANGA PRASAD TIWARI | IND | 167 | 0.2% |
| 18 | SHABBIR SHAH | 155 | 0.2% | |
| 19 | SURESH KUMAR SHUKLA | IND | 134 | 0.1% |
| 20 | ANIL PANDEY | IND | 121 | 0.1% |
| 21 | SOMDATTA MISHRA | 109 | 0.1% | |
| 22 | KAMLA PRASAD | IND | 102 | 0.1% |
| 23 | NAGENDRA PRASAD PANDEY | IND | 95 | 0.1% |
| 24 | NARENDRA PRATAP SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 79 | 0.1% |
| 25 | SANTOSH | 72 | 0.1% | |
| 26 | MATLOOB ALAM | IND | 55 | 0.1% |
| 27 | SHYAM SUNDAR TIWARI | IND | 46 | 0.1% |
| 28 | DADDI KOL | IND | 39 | 0.0% |
| 29 | SURESH SINGH TIWARI | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
| 30 | CHANDERAM CHAMAR | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
| 31 | BANSHIDHAR WADHWANI | IND | 35 | 0.0% |
| 32 | SANTOSH KUMAR | IND | 32 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (154th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe9.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 20.9% · min 1.3% · max 52.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
76%
lowerhigher
154th of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.73
fewer partiesmore parties
51st of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.7%
lowerhigher
149th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
320 seats · 161 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.73EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 37.2%BJP 27.4%BSP 18.3%JD 9.1%OTH 8.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,28,935
Density
297 / km²
Sex ratio
926 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,502 km²
SC population17.9%
ST population14.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
97%HINDU
Hindu 96.8%Other 3.2%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water10.7%
Electricity61.6%
Sanitation29.8%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births85.5%
Children fully vaccinated76.3%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.4%
Children underweight (under 5)31.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER57.3%
Women literate69.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER12.9%
Clean cooking fuel35.2%
Health insurance22.0%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.