Tikamgarh
Winner — 1993
A closely fought contest. BUNDELA YAADVENDER SINGH won with a 3.3% margin.
All Candidates
15 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BUNDELA YAADVENDER SINGH | INC | 44,454 | 48.3% |
| 2 | GOYEEL MAGANLAL | BJP | 41,407 | 45.0% |
| 3 | GOKUL PRASAD | IND | 1,548 | 1.7% |
| 4 | SAKIR KHAN | 1,007 | 1.1% | |
| 5 | GOKAL PRASAD | IND | 954 | 1.0% |
| 6 | DURGA PRASAD | 704 | 0.8% | |
| 7 | BALKISHAN VISAVKARMA | BVD | 344 | 0.4% |
| 8 | NATHURAM MAINVAR | IND | 289 | 0.3% |
| 9 | DAVKI NANDAN SWARANKAR | Samajwadi Party | 283 | 0.3% |
| 10 | CHORASIYA HARGOVIND | IND | 279 | 0.3% |
| 11 | MAKHAN LAL | IND | 204 | 0.2% |
| 12 | BABU LAL BHADKUL | IND | 199 | 0.2% |
| 13 | AVASTHI RAKESH KUMAR | IND | 189 | 0.2% |
| 14 | BALDEV PRASAD | IND | 78 | 0.1% |
| 15 | SHANTI KUMAR SHASTRI | IND | 78 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (84th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
5 locations
Half-fallen fane of Chandi having a shrine and a porch.,
Half-fallen fane of Chandi having a shrine and a porch.,
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.