Back to Madhya Pradesh 1990 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 64 · 1990
Rampur Baghelan
Winner — 1990
TOSHAN SINGH
JD· National Front
JD 24.5%BJP 22.7%26 others 52.8%
Votes
18,295
24.5% share
Winning margin
1,348
1.8% of votes
Total candidates
28
Turnout
60.2%
of 1,23,981
Rampur Baghelan was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.8% — fewer than 1,348 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
28 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TOSHAN SINGH | National Front | 18,295 | 24.5% |
| 2 | PRABHAKAR SINGH | BJP | 16,947 | 22.7% |
| 3 | ASHOK SINGH | INC | 12,359 | 16.6% |
| 4 | RAMLAKHAN SINGH | 8,126 | 10.9% | |
| 5 | SUTUSEN SINGH | IND | 6,556 | 8.8% |
| 6 | RAJENDRA KUMAR KUSHWAHA | LKD(B) | 1,612 | 2.2% |
| 7 | GAVI PRASAD VERMA GUTIYA | IND | 1,396 | 1.9% |
| 8 | VERENDRA KUMAR | IND | 1,340 | 1.8% |
| 9 | RAM KHELAWAN | IND | 985 | 1.3% |
| 10 | RAM AUTAR | IND | 693 | 0.9% |
| 11 | RAM LAKHAN | IND | 635 | 0.8% |
| 12 | BHAIYA LAL | 626 | 0.8% | |
| 13 | MOLAI SINGH | IND | 556 | 0.8% |
| 14 | GANESH TRIVEDI | IND | 466 | 0.6% |
| 15 | DADHIWAL PRASAD SATNAMI | IND | 421 | 0.6% |
| 16 | OM PRAKASH | IND | 420 | 0.6% |
| 17 | CHUNUWAD | IND | 415 | 0.6% |
| 18 | DEWAKAR SWAROP TRIPATHI | IND | 407 | 0.6% |
| 19 | KAILASE PRASAH SHUKLA | IND | 380 | 0.5% |
| 20 | RAJMANI | IND | 354 | 0.5% |
| 21 | SURYA KANT SINGH | IND | 327 | 0.4% |
| 22 | NAGENDRA SINGH | IND | 310 | 0.4% |
| 23 | KRISHNA PAL SINGH | IND | 227 | 0.3% |
| 24 | RAM JIYAWAN KOL | IND | 224 | 0.3% |
| 25 | BRIJ KISHOR DWIVEDI | IND | 207 | 0.3% |
| 26 | SHRI NIWAS PANDEY | IND | 167 | 0.2% |
| 27 | PRAMOD SINGH | IND | 108 | 0.1% |
| 28 | AJAY KUMAR SINGH | IND | 57 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (148th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean1.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.3% · min 0.7% · max 50.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
77%
lowerhigher
148th of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.23
fewer partiesmore parties
13th of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
108th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
320 seats · 161 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.23EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 24.5%BJP 22.7%INC 16.6%BSP 10.9%IND 8.8%OTH 16.5%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,28,935
Density
297 / km²
Sex ratio
926 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,502 km²
SC population17.9%
ST population14.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
97%HINDU
Hindu 96.8%Other 3.2%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water10.7%
Electricity61.6%
Sanitation29.8%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births85.5%
Children fully vaccinated76.3%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.4%
Children underweight (under 5)31.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER57.3%
Women literate69.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER12.9%
Clean cooking fuel35.2%
Health insurance22.0%
What's nearby?
2 locationsSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.