Back to Madhya Pradesh 1990 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 127 · 1990
Raipur Rural
Winner — 1990
TARUN CHATERJI
JD· National Front
JD 47.4%INC 41.9%29 others 10.7%
Votes
42,061
47.4% share
Winning margin
4,837
5.5% of votes
Total candidates
31
Turnout
50.4%
of 1,76,167
A clear win with a 5.5% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
31 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TARUN CHATERJI | National Front | 42,061 | 47.4% |
| 2 | MOHAMMAD AKBAR | INC | 37,224 | 41.9% |
| 3 | CHAMMAN LAL NETAM | IND | 1,743 | 2.0% |
| 4 | LOKNATH SAHA (SOMA ORIYA ) | 733 | 0.8% | |
| 5 | SHARDA PRASAD DWIVEDI | IND | 664 | 0.8% |
| 6 | MANTHAR RAM | IND | 614 | 0.7% |
| 7 | MADHU NAYAK | IND | 606 | 0.7% |
| 8 | LAL SINGH | IND | 577 | 0.7% |
| 9 | SOMNATH SAHU | IND | 546 | 0.6% |
| 10 | SHANKAR DUBE | IND | 408 | 0.5% |
| 11 | MEENA KUMARI | LKD(B) | 348 | 0.4% |
| 12 | BHUPENDRA SINGH SINDHU | IND | 311 | 0.3% |
| 13 | KULDIP SINGH DHALIWAL | IND | 303 | 0.3% |
| 14 | JANAK LAL | IND | 294 | 0.3% |
| 15 | GAJENDRA VERMA | IND | 292 | 0.3% |
| 16 | GOVERDHAN LAL YADU | IND | 236 | 0.3% |
| 17 | NARAYAN | IND | 193 | 0.2% |
| 18 | VIJAY PANDE | IND | 187 | 0.2% |
| 19 | DHANIRAM SAHU | IND | 184 | 0.2% |
| 20 | GHANSHYAM PRASAD TIWARI | IND | 163 | 0.2% |
| 21 | UDAIBHAN SINGH CHAUHAN | IND | 160 | 0.2% |
| 22 | HARISH KUMAR NAINWANI | IND | 145 | 0.2% |
| 23 | BAL KRISHNA | IND | 138 | 0.2% |
| 24 | GANGADHAR GILHARE | IND | 124 | 0.1% |
| 25 | SHRINIVAS PATNAYAK | IND | 119 | 0.1% |
| 26 | SURESH GOKHANE | IND | 105 | 0.1% |
| 27 | SURESH ROTKAR | IND | 97 | 0.1% |
| 28 | SOMADITYA SHUSLA (LALLI) | IND | 82 | 0.1% |
| 29 | ASHISH | IND | 74 | 0.1% |
| 30 | A.K. DHRUW | 48 | 0.1% | |
| 31 | SURESH AGRAWAL | IND | 25 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (44th), a closer-than-average contest, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean5.5%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.9% · min 0.1% · max 42.1%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
85%
lowerhigher
44th of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.25
fewer partiesmore parties
113th of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.6%
lowerhigher
32nd of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
320 seats · 161 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.25EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 47.4%INC 41.9%OTH 10.7%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
20,90,922
Density
177 / km²
Sex ratio
964 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
11,815 km²
SC population11.1%
ST population36.8%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
92%HINDU
Hindu 92.0%Other 8.0%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water37.4%
Electricity78.7%
Sanitation25.5%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births92.2%
Children fully vaccinated65.3%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER23.9%
Children underweight (under 5)32.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER41.7%
Women literate72.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.6%
Clean cooking fuel43.6%
Health insurance48.5%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Oranges & Orange Products
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.