Narnaul
Winner — 2014
A closely fought contest. OM PRAKASH won with a 4.7% margin.
2 of 15 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹1.61 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OM PRAKASH | BJP (NDA) | 31,664 | 32.8% |
| 2 | KAMLESH | 27,091 | 28.1% | |
| 3 | NARENDER SINGH | UPA | 13,899 | 14.4% |
| 4 | SURESH KUMAR SAINI | IND | 9,497 | 9.8% |
| 5 | ROSHAN LAL YADAV | HJCBL | 4,698 | 4.9% |
| 6 | SANDEEP YADAV | IND | 4,165 | 4.3% |
| 7 | KISHAN CHAUDHARY | IND | 1,721 | 1.8% |
| 8 | DIL RAJ | IND | 792 | 0.8% |
| 9 | ANIL KUMAR | BSP | 698 | 0.7% |
| 10 | RAM KISHAN | IND | 535 | 0.6% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 479 | 0.5% |
| 12 | SURESH JANGRA | RBC | 408 | 0.4% |
| 13 | UMAKANT | IND | 349 | 0.4% |
| 14 | KRISHAN KUMAR | IND | 197 | 0.2% |
| 15 | SUBHASH CHAND HUDINA | 196 | 0.2% | |
| 16 | DARA SINGH | HALP | 156 | 0.2% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (59th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹1.61 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
3 locations
Shah Ibrahim's tomb together with adjacent land as shown in the plan
Shah Ibrahim's tomb together with adjacent land as shown in the plan
Shah Quli Khan's Tomb with adjacent land
Shah Quli Khan's Tomb with adjacent land
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.