Nala
Winner — 2000
Nala was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.7% — fewer than 634 votes separated winner from runner-up.
All Candidates
10 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BISHESWAR KHAN | CPI | 20,324 | 23.3% |
| 2 | RABINDRA NATH MAHATO | 19,690 | 22.6% | |
| 3 | RAJ KUMARI HIMMAT SINGHKO | INC | 17,752 | 20.4% |
| 4 | SATYA NAND JHA | NDA | 16,349 | 18.7% |
| 5 | SHIBADAS SOREN | CPI(ML)(L) | 4,372 | 5.0% |
| 6 | DIGAMBER PD. SAHA | IND | 3,564 | 4.1% |
| 7 | BAMA YADAV | NDA | 2,302 | 2.6% |
| 8 | SATISH CHANDRA RAO | 1,083 | 1.2% | |
| 9 | BASANT KUMAR MISHRA | BHJC | 902 | 1.0% |
| 10 | BASUDEO BESRA | IND | 892 | 1.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (60th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
3 locations

Ancient site of Vikramshila Monastry
Ancient site of Vikramshila Monastry
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.