Back to Bihar 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 59 · 1990
Muzaffarpur
Winner — 1990
RAGHUNATH PANDEY
INC· INC
INC 64.0%JD 22.9%32 others 13.1%
Votes
82,918
64.0% share
Winning margin
53,316
41.2% of votes
Total candidates
34
Turnout
62.3%
of 2,07,753
Muzaffarpur is a safe seat — RAGHUNATH PANDEY won by 41.2%.
Seat history
All Candidates
34 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAGHUNATH PANDEY | INC | 82,918 | 64.0% |
| 2 | ARUN KU. SINHA | National Front | 29,602 | 22.9% |
| 3 | SHIVENDRA PRASAD SINGH | BJP | 8,757 | 6.8% |
| 4 | KEDARNATH GUPTA | Left | 4,341 | 3.4% |
| 5 | OM PRASASH | PBI | 732 | 0.6% |
| 6 | MAHANTA KAUSHLENDRA DAS | IND | 399 | 0.3% |
| 7 | M.ISRAEL | IND | 380 | 0.3% |
| 8 | MADAN MOHAN KRISHNA | 361 | 0.3% | |
| 9 | SHYED SNAMSHIR HUSSAIN | IND | 265 | 0.2% |
| 10 | HASMET KARIM |  MULNational Front | 215 | 0.2% |
| 11 | SANJAY KUMAR SINGH | IND | 166 | 0.1% |
| 12 | SHAMBHU NATH SRIVASATAVA | IND | 143 | 0.1% |
| 13 | MANOHAR PRASAD GUPTA | LKD(B) | 139 | 0.1% |
| 14 | SHANKAR OJHA | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 15 | NRIPENDRA KISHORE | IND | 100 | 0.1% |
| 16 | PRAMOD TEWARI | IND | 95 | 0.1% |
| 17 | KHURSHID ALAM | BBP | 85 | 0.1% |
| 18 | MISHRI LAL SHAH | 78 | 0.1% | |
| 19 | PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA | 76 | 0.1% | |
| 20 | PURUSOTTAM JALAN | IND | 74 | 0.1% |
| 21 | SHANKAR PANDEY | IND | 74 | 0.1% |
| 22 | VIJAY KU. GUPTA | IND | 72 | 0.1% |
| 23 | KAILASH RAM | IND | 59 | 0.1% |
| 24 | PRAVAN KU. NATHANI | IND | 46 | 0.0% |
| 25 | VINAY BHUSHAN | SOP(L) | 44 | 0.0% |
| 26 | JAGDISH | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
| 27 | BINDA SINGH | IND | 30 | 0.0% |
| 28 | BINDA MAHTO | IND | 30 | 0.0% |
| 29 | SHUDHANSHU KUMAR | IND | 29 | 0.0% |
| 30 | KRANTI PRAKASH | IND | 23 | 0.0% |
| 31 | BRAHMA DEO PIPASIT | IND | 19 | 0.0% |
| 32 | PRABHAT SINHA | IND | 12 | 0.0% |
| 33 | SOHAN LALA SAHU | IND | 9 | 0.0% |
| 34 | SURUYA DEO PRASAD SWAMI | IND | 1 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (74th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe41.2%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 24.5% · min 0.4% · max 67.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
71%
lowerhigher
74th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.18
fewer partiesmore parties
237th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.0%
lowerhigher
90th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.18EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 64.0%JD 22.9%BJP 6.8%OTH 6.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
32,64,619
Density
1011 / km²
Sex ratio
921 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
3,229 km²
SC population12.0%
ST population4.3%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
61%HINDU
Hindu 60.9%Muslim 38.5%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water2.0%
Electricity13.4%
Sanitation13.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births68.9%
Children fully vaccinated62.7%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.5%
Children underweight (under 5)47.1%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER66.0%
Women literate47.5%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER51.2%
Clean cooking fuel19.3%
Health insurance10.2%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Bamboo Art🏺Jute🏺Makhana (Foxnut)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.