Back to Bihar 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 51 · 1990
Lalganj
Winner — 1990
KEDAR NATH PRASAD
JD· National Front
JD 36.2%INC 32.8%27 others 31.0%
Votes
40,353
36.2% share
Winning margin
3,810
3.4% of votes
Total candidates
29
Turnout
73.2%
of 1,52,219
A closely fought contest. KEDAR NATH PRASAD won with a 3.4% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
29 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KEDAR NATH PRASAD | National Front | 40,353 | 36.2% |
| 2 | BHARAT PRASAD SINGH | INC | 36,543 | 32.8% |
| 3 | KAUSKENDRA SHUKLA | JNP(JP) | 24,180 | 21.7% |
| 4 | RAM CHANDRA RAI | IND | 7,643 | 6.9% |
| 5 | MISHRI LAL RAI | Left | 656 | 0.6% |
| 6 | JAI NARAYAN MAHTO | 412 | 0.4% | |
| 7 | NAGENDRA SHARMA | IND | 219 | 0.2% |
| 8 | SUNIL PRASAD | 214 | 0.2% | |
| 9 | ASHOK SAHANI | IND | 174 | 0.2% |
| 10 | GANESH DUT SHARMA | SSD | 145 | 0.1% |
| 11 | CHANDESHWAR SINGH | PVP | 111 | 0.1% |
| 12 | EDRISH HUSSAIN | ICS(SCS) | 97 | 0.1% |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR SINGH | LKD(B) | 96 | 0.1% |
| 14 | RAMA SHANKAR PRASAD YADAV | BBP | 73 | 0.1% |
| 15 | RAMCHANDRA PRASAD SINGH | RRP | 69 | 0.1% |
| 16 | HARENDRA SAHANI | IND | 65 | 0.1% |
| 17 | UMESH SINGH | 62 | 0.1% | |
| 18 | DILIP KUMAR PANDEY | 55 | 0.1% | |
| 19 | RAMA NAND SINGH | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
| 20 | DHANESHWAR RAI | IND | 33 | 0.0% |
| 21 | RADHE SHYAM SHUKALA | IND | 24 | 0.0% |
| 22 | RAM SAHAYA SINGH | IND | 19 | 0.0% |
| 23 | DINESH KUMAR SHUKLA | IND | 18 | 0.0% |
| 24 | PREM KUMAR SHUKLA | IND | 14 | 0.0% |
| 25 | RAMENDRA PRASAD SRIVASTAVA | DBM | 14 | 0.0% |
| 26 | JAI MANGAL SINGH | IND | 13 | 0.0% |
| 27 | LOK NATH SINGH | IND | 13 | 0.0% |
| 28 | DHURANDHAR CHAUDHARY | IND | 8 | 0.0% |
| 29 | BIPIN BIHARI SINGH | IND | 6 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (48th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe3.4%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 18.2% · min 1.9% · max 54.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
73%
lowerhigher
48th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.32
fewer partiesmore parties
209th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
220th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.32EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 36.2%INC 32.8%JNP(JP) 21.7%IND 6.9%OTH 2.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
28,11,569
Density
993 / km²
Sex ratio
921 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,830 km²
SC population13.6%
ST population1.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
57%HINDU
Hindu 56.7%Muslim 43.0%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.5%
Electricity7.7%
Sanitation9.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births66.2%
Children fully vaccinated61.6%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.9%
Children underweight (under 5)47.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER67.9%
Women literate43.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER52.0%
Clean cooking fuel15.2%
Health insurance19.5%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Jute🏷️MakhanaGI
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.