Back to Bihar 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 231 · 1990
Chainpur
Winner — 1990
LAL MUNI CHAUBE
BJP· BJP
BJP 23.1%BSP 18.8%26 others 58.1%
Votes
19,648
23.1% share
Winning margin
3,654
4.3% of votes
Total candidates
28
Turnout
59.6%
of 1,42,816
A closely fought contest. LAL MUNI CHAUBE won with a 4.3% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
28 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAL MUNI CHAUBE | BJP | 19,648 | 23.1% |
| 2 | MAHABALI SINGH | 15,994 | 18.8% | |
| 3 | VIJAY SEN SINGH | IND | 12,725 | 14.9% |
| 4 | KISHORI PRASAD | IND | 10,200 | 12.0% |
| 5 | SHAHNEWAJ KHAN | IND | 9,821 | 11.5% |
| 6 | KAMLA SINGH | Left | 4,146 | 4.9% |
| 7 | TILESHWAR SINGH | INC | 3,535 | 4.2% |
| 8 | SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH | IND | 2,581 | 3.0% |
| 9 | HARI RAM | IND | 2,278 | 2.7% |
| 10 | SURYA NATH SINGH | IND | 630 | 0.7% |
| 11 | RAJENDER PANDEY | IND | 582 | 0.7% |
| 12 | LALWARTI SINGH | PBI | 545 | 0.6% |
| 13 | DHANU CHAMAR | IND | 489 | 0.6% |
| 14 | CHHAIVAR DUSADH | IND | 354 | 0.4% |
| 15 | VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH | LKD(B) | 249 | 0.3% |
| 16 | MUKTESHWAR PANDEY | 232 | 0.3% | |
| 17 | AMINUDIN MIR | DMM | 179 | 0.2% |
| 18 | ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY | IND | 138 | 0.2% |
| 19 | CHANDRMA SINGH | DMKP | 130 | 0.1% |
| 20 | JAGARNATH RAM | IND | 124 | 0.1% |
| 21 | FEKU SINGH | IND | 116 | 0.1% |
| 22 | VASHISTH SINGH | IND | 103 | 0.1% |
| 23 | ACHARYA RAMADHAR KUSHWAHA | SSD | 96 | 0.1% |
| 24 | SHARAD CHANDER SINGH | IND | 84 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAMESH SINGH | IND | 65 | 0.1% |
| 26 | RAM BILASH SINGH | IND | 44 | 0.1% |
| 27 | ASHOK KUMAR SINGH | IND | 24 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MARTYUNJAY SINGH | IND | 19 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (81st), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean4.3%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 9.1% · min 0.6% · max 34.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
70%
lowerhigher
81st of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.43
fewer partiesmore parties
170th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.0%
lowerhigher
86th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.43EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 23.1%BSP 18.8%IND 14.9%IND 12.0%IND 11.5%OTH 19.7%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
43,91,418
Density
883 / km²
Sex ratio
938 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,976 km²
SC population30.4%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
88%HINDU
Hindu 88.3%Muslim 11.1%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water5.3%
Electricity16.3%
Sanitation24.2%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births76.6%
Children fully vaccinated85.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER47.4%
Children underweight (under 5)43.5%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER64.3%
Women literate59.4%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER42.8%
Clean cooking fuel34.7%
Health insurance9.7%
What's nearby?
1 locationSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Handloom/Garments🏺Stone Art🏺Tilkut
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.