Back to Uttar Pradesh 2012 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 353 · 2012
Madhuban
Winner — 2012
UMESH PANDEY
BSP· BSP
BSP 27.9%SP 27.1%20 others 45.0%
Votes
51,572
27.9% share
Winning margin
1,356
0.7% of votes
Total candidates
22
Turnout
54.3%
of 3,40,905
Madhuban was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.7% — fewer than 1,356 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
22 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UMESH PANDEY | BSP | 51,572 | 27.9% |
| 2 | RAJENDRA MISHRA | Samajwadi Party | 50,216 | 27.1% |
| 3 | UTPAL RAI | INC | 26,388 | 14.3% |
| 4 | HRIDAY NARAYAN | SBSP | 22,513 | 12.2% |
| 5 | OM PRAKASH | JPS | 21,797 | 11.8% |
| 6 | GANGA RAI | 2,043 | 1.1% | |
| 7 | JANARDAN | AD | 1,749 | 0.9% |
| 8 | SHYAM SUNDAR | 915 | 0.5% | |
| 9 | SACHITANAND | 880 | 0.5% | |
| 10 | GUDDU | IND | 839 | 0.5% |
| 11 | AKHILESH |  AITC | 763 | 0.4% |
| 12 | JAWAHIR | IND | 734 | 0.4% |
| 13 | ANAND KUMAR | RUC | 717 | 0.4% |
| 14 | RUDAL SINGH ALIAS VIJAY PRATAP SINGH | IND | 672 | 0.4% |
| 15 | LALLAN CHAUHAN | IJP | 656 | 0.3% |
| 16 | KAMTA | 493 | 0.3% | |
| 17 | PRAHLAD | IND | 470 | 0.3% |
| 18 | MUHAMMAD NOORNAIN | RSMD | 390 | 0.2% |
| 19 | RAMJEET | JaKP | 339 | 0.2% |
| 20 | RAJENDRA | IND | 337 | 0.2% |
| 21 | MUSAFIR | ARVP | 275 | 0.1% |
| 22 | PAWAN | IND | 238 | 0.1% |
.png){kind=small}
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (343rd), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean0.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 8.0% · min 0.2% · max 32.6%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
55%
lowerhigher
343rd of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.46
fewer partiesmore parties
19th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.6%
lowerhigher
257th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
403 seats · 202 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.46EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BSP 27.9%SP 27.1%INC 14.3%SBSP 12.2%JPS 11.8%OTH 6.8%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,05,968
Density
1288 / km²
Sex ratio
979 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,713 km²
SC population21.5%
ST population1.0%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
80%HINDU
Hindu 80.2%Muslim 19.4%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water13.1%
Electricity46.7%
Sanitation27.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births94.7%
Children fully vaccinated59.1%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.4%
Children underweight (under 5)30.3%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER44.3%
Women literate72.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.0%
Clean cooking fuel54.2%
Health insurance16.0%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Powerloom Textile
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.