Back to Uttar Pradesh 2012 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 248 · 2012
Pratapgarh
Winner — 2012
NAGENDRA SINGH MUNNA YADAV
SP· Samajwadi Party
SP 26.0%BSP 21.5%30 others 52.6%
Votes
43,754
25.9% share
Winning margin
7,510
4.5% of votes
Total candidates
32
Turnout
54.9%
of 3,07,047
A closely fought contest. NAGENDRA SINGH MUNNA YADAV won with a 4.5% margin.
Seat history
6 of 32 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.22 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAGENDRA SINGH MUNNA YADAV | Samajwadi Party | 43,754 | 25.9% |
| 2 | SANJAY | BSP | 36,244 | 21.5% |
| 3 | HARI PRATAP SINGH | NDA | 25,619 | 15.2% |
| 4 | ANISH SINGH RINKU | AD | 24,278 | 14.4% |
| 5 | SHYAM KISHOR | INC | 7,772 | 4.6% |
| 6 | RAJKUMAR SINGH RAI SAHAB | 7,509 | 4.5% | |
| 7 | BRIJESH SAURABH | 6,136 | 3.6% | |
| 8 | RAMKARAN PAL | RALP | 1,337 | 0.8% |
| 9 | ABHAY | 1,271 | 0.8% | |
| 10 | SUSHIL KUMAR | IND | 1,096 | 0.7% |
| 11 | MANOJ KUMAR | IND | 1,054 | 0.6% |
| 12 | MUKESH MISHRA | JaVM | 1,040 | 0.6% |
| 13 | ABDUL RASHID ANSARI | MC | 842 | 0.5% |
| 14 | RAMDEEN | 817 | 0.5% | |
| 15 | SUSHEEL KUMAR | RUC | 816 | 0.5% |
| 16 | JAHID BABBE BHAI | MeyP | 736 | 0.4% |
| 17 | DR. A. K. KULSHRESHTHA | JaBhP | 723 | 0.4% |
| 18 | RAM PRATAP ALIAS MENDHU PASI | IND | 707 | 0.4% |
| 19 | LALIT KUMAR | IND | 684 | 0.4% |
| 20 | GUNAKAR | LD | 655 | 0.4% |
| 21 | ER. PRABHAT CHANDRA TRIPATHI | RJPK | 636 | 0.4% |
| 22 | RAMKARAN | RsAD | 587 | 0.3% |
| 23 | KHARPATTURAM | IND | 581 | 0.3% |
| 24 | TARUN KUMAR ALIAS VARUN | PBSD | 533 | 0.3% |
| 25 | SHIVRAM | IND | 478 | 0.3% |
| 26 | ARUNA DEVI | MwSP | 463 | 0.3% |
| 27 | SHUKDEO PRASAD | 444 | 0.3% | |
| 28 | RAMDAYAL VERMA | RSBP | 436 | 0.3% |
| 29 | KUSH OJHA | YVP | 385 | 0.2% |
| 30 | CHATURI PRASAD | IND | 358 | 0.2% |
| 31 | SHITLA PRASAD AGRAHARI SUJAN | IND | 313 | 0.2% |
| 32 | MOHD IRSHAD | IND | 295 | 0.2% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (348th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean4.5%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 9.5% · min 0.3% · max 20.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
55%
lowerhigher
348th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.02
fewer partiesmore parties
99th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.7%
lowerhigher
170th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
403 seats · 202 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.02EFFECTIVE PARTIES
SP 25.9%BSP 21.5%BJP 15.2%AD 14.4%OTH 23.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
6/32
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.22 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
32,09,141
Density
863 / km²
Sex ratio
998 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
3,717 km²
SC population22.1%
ST population0.0%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
85%HINDU
Hindu 85.1%Muslim 14.1%Other 0.8%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water21.3%
Electricity26.3%
Sanitation14.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births90.8%
Children fully vaccinated75.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER35.5%
Children underweight (under 5)27.7%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER48.9%
Women literate74.8%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.0%
Clean cooking fuel37.1%
Health insurance14.9%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Aamla Products
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.