Boudh
Winner — 2009
Boudh is a safe seat — PRADIP KUMAR AMAT won by 28.9%.
2 of 13 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.00 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
13 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRADIP KUMAR AMAT | BJD | 49,439 | 50.6% |
| 2 | SUSANTA KUMAR PRADHAN | IND | 21,232 | 21.7% |
| 3 | NARENDRA KUMAR PANIGRAHI | UPA | 15,895 | 16.3% |
| 4 | SANTANU KUMAR PRADHAN | NDA | 4,666 | 4.8% |
| 5 | BUDHADEV PRADHAN | IND | 1,028 | 1.1% |
| 6 | GANGADHAR HANSA | BSP | 1,005 | 1.0% |
| 7 | PUSPITA PATTANAYAK | SAMO | 958 | 1.0% |
| 8 | GITANJALI BAGHA | Samajwadi Party | 770 | 0.8% |
| 9 | RAMESWAR NAYAK | IND | 767 | 0.8% |
| 10 | BAROJ KUMAR BEHERA | IND | 659 | 0.7% |
| 11 | RASMI PRASAD BEHERA | IND | 444 | 0.5% |
| 12 | KISHORE CHANDRA BHOI | IND | 439 | 0.5% |
| 13 | SANJAY BEHERA | IND | 406 | 0.4% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
High turnout (18th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.00 Cr
A sparsely populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
3 locationsPaschima Somanatha, Bhubanesvara and Kapilesvara temples
Paschima Somanatha, Bhubanesvara and Kapilesvara temples

Temples of Nila-Madhava and Siddhesvara
Temples of Nila-Madhava and Siddhesvara
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.
