Back to Madhya Pradesh 2013 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 9 · 2013
Ater
Winner — 2013
SATYADEV KATARE
INC· INC (UPA)
INC 40.3%BJP 30.2%30 others 29.5%
Votes
45,592
40.3% share
Winning margin
11,426
10.1% of votes
Total candidates
31
Turnout
57.9%
of 1,95,586
A clear win with a 10.1% margin.
Seat history
1 of 31 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.10 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYADEV KATARE | INC (UPA) | 45,592 | 40.3% |
| 2 | ARVIND SINGH BHADORIYA | NDA | 34,166 | 30.2% |
| 3 | MAHENDRA SINGH BHADORIYA | BSP | 19,972 | 17.6% |
| 4 | NAROTTAM SINGH NARWARIYA ADVOCATE | BASD | 6,680 | 5.9% |
| 5 | B.K. BOHARE | Samajwadi Party | 735 | 0.7% |
| 6 | SARNAM SINGH BHADORIYA | IND | 694 | 0.6% |
| 7 | DEVENDRA SINGH BHADORIYA | IND | 631 | 0.6% |
| 8 | ARVIND SINGH CHAUHAN | GMS | 511 | 0.5% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 499 | 0.4% |
| 10 | SHYAM SUNDAR PUROHIT | UPA | 352 | 0.3% |
| 11 | PARASHURAM SAMADHIYA | IND | 350 | 0.3% |
| 12 | DEVRAJ SINGH YADAV | IND | 307 | 0.3% |
| 13 | SHIVKUMAR | IND | 238 | 0.2% |
| 14 | BRAJENDRA | IND | 204 | 0.2% |
| 15 | SARVENDRA SINGH URF PAPPU BAMBAIYA | IND | 202 | 0.2% |
| 16 | PRADEEP VARUA | IND | 194 | 0.2% |
| 17 | GANGASHAREN | IND | 191 | 0.2% |
| 18 | KULDEEP SINGH NARWARIYA (MAHAPUR) | IND | 188 | 0.2% |
| 19 | CHANDRA VEER SINGH | IND | 183 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SATYA NARAYAN PUROHIT | AASP | 181 | 0.2% |
| 21 | LAKHAN SINGH BAGHEL | IND | 177 | 0.2% |
| 22 | UMESH BHADORIYA | IND | 135 | 0.1% |
| 23 | VINOD UPADHYAYA | IND | 127 | 0.1% |
| 24 | OM PRAKASH SHARMA | IND | 112 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAJ VEER CHAUBE VINDWA | IND | 90 | 0.1% |
| 26 | BRAJESH SINGH BHADORIYA | IND | 85 | 0.1% |
| 27 | BRAJESH KUMAR SHARMA | IND | 78 | 0.1% |
| 28 | MANSHARAM JATAV | IND | 72 | 0.1% |
| 29 | PRADEEP SINGH | IND | 58 | 0.1% |
| 30 | SATENDRA KUMAR PATHAK | NDA | 58 | 0.1% |
| 31 | RAMBAHADUR | IND | 54 | 0.1% |
| 32 | RAVINDRA SINGH URF BABLU BHADORIYA | IND | 46 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (221st), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean10.1%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.2% · min 1.8% · max 31.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
64%
lowerhigher
221st of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.02
fewer partiesmore parties
25th of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.1%
lowerhigher
230th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
230 seats · 116 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.02EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 40.3%BJP 30.2%BSP 17.6%BASD 5.9%OTH 5.5%NOTA 0.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
1/31
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.10 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
17,03,005
Density
382 / km²
Sex ratio
837 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,459 km²
SC population22.0%
ST population0.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
94%HINDU
Hindu 93.7%Other 6.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water13.2%
Electricity36.1%
Sanitation23.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births93.5%
Children fully vaccinated70.7%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER32.2%
Children underweight (under 5)29.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER69.9%
Women literate70.2%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.1%
Clean cooking fuel31.0%
Health insurance31.0%
What's nearby?
4 locationsSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Mustard
🏛️
🏛️
🏛️
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.