Back to Madhya Pradesh 2013 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 11 · 2013
Lahar
Winner — 2013
DR. GOVIND SINGH
INC· INC (UPA)
INC 36.6%BJP 32.3%29 others 31.1%
Votes
53,012
36.6% share
Winning margin
6,273
4.3% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
65.3%
of 2,21,640
A closely fought contest. DR. GOVIND SINGH won with a 4.3% margin.
Seat history
4 of 30 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.09 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
31 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. GOVIND SINGH | INC (UPA) | 53,012 | 36.6% |
| 2 | RASAL SINGH | NDA | 46,739 | 32.3% |
| 3 | ROMESH MAHANT | BSP | 34,585 | 23.9% |
| 4 | OM PRAKASH RATHAUR | BASD | 1,047 | 0.7% |
| 5 | GABBAR SINGH | IND | 938 | 0.7% |
| 6 | KRISHAN NARAYAN KUSHWAHA | MD | 756 | 0.5% |
| 7 | DEVANAND NAYAK URF DEEPAK BHAIYA | IND | 670 | 0.5% |
| 8 | SMT. MUNNESH-MULAYAM SINGH | UPA | 664 | 0.5% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 571 | 0.4% |
| 10 | UMASHANKAR | IND | 547 | 0.4% |
| 11 | PARMAL SINGH | IND | 537 | 0.4% |
| 12 | MAHIPAL SINGH | IND | 454 | 0.3% |
| 13 | INDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 427 | 0.3% |
| 14 | EKLAS KHAN URF ELYAS KHAN | RSMD | 416 | 0.3% |
| 15 | RAM KUMAR | IND | 298 | 0.2% |
| 16 | SANJAY SINGH (RAJA JI) | NLP | 272 | 0.2% |
| 17 | ONKAR SINGH | IND | 267 | 0.2% |
| 18 | RAMESHWAR DAYAL PATEL | IND | 257 | 0.2% |
| 19 | PRADEEP | IND | 254 | 0.2% |
| 20 | BHAGBATI PRASAD DUBEY | Samajwadi Party | 244 | 0.2% |
| 21 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 241 | 0.2% |
| 22 | RAMKUMAR SINGH | IND | 190 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SARVESH | IND | 185 | 0.1% |
| 24 | DEVENDRA SINGH | IND | 185 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAMASHANKAR SINGH | IND | 176 | 0.1% |
| 26 | BANNAM SINGH | AASP | 176 | 0.1% |
| 27 | AWADHESH SINGH | IND | 175 | 0.1% |
| 28 | RAM PRATAP SINGH KUSHWAH | IND | 154 | 0.1% |
| 29 | ARVIND SINGH | IND | 142 | 0.1% |
| 30 | YOGENDRA SINGH | IND | 129 | 0.1% |
| 31 | BRIJ MOHAN DOORWAR | IND | 118 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (212th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe4.3%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 15.9% · min 3.6% · max 39.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
68%
lowerhigher
212th of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.91
fewer partiesmore parties
38th of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
106th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
230 seats · 116 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.91EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 36.6%BJP 32.3%BSP 23.9%OTH 6.9%NOTA 0.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
4/30
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.09 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
17,03,005
Density
382 / km²
Sex ratio
837 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,459 km²
SC population22.0%
ST population0.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
94%HINDU
Hindu 93.7%Other 6.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water13.2%
Electricity36.1%
Sanitation23.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births93.5%
Children fully vaccinated70.7%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER32.2%
Children underweight (under 5)29.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER69.9%
Women literate70.2%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.1%
Clean cooking fuel31.0%
Health insurance31.0%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Mustard
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.