Back to Karnataka 1994 map
Winner — 1994
UDASI CHANBASAPPA MAHLINGAPPA
JD· Janata Dal
JD 55.2%INC 38.0%6 others 6.8%
Votes
56,348
55.2% share
Winning margin
17,483
17.1% of votes
Total candidates
8
Turnout
78.3%
of 1,30,441
Hanagal is a safe seat — UDASI CHANBASAPPA MAHLINGAPPA won by 17.1%.
Seat history
All Candidates
8 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UDASI CHANBASAPPA MAHLINGAPPA | Janata Dal | 56,348 | 55.2% |
| 2 | MANOHAR HANUMANTAPPA TAHSILDAR | INC | 38,865 | 38.0% |
| 3 | BABJI MANJUNATH KRISHNAJAPPA | BJP | 3,391 | 3.3% |
| 4 | FAKIRAPPA TOTAPPA NINGOJI | KCP | 2,980 | 2.9% |
| 5 | KALLANGOUDRA SANGANGOUDA CHANBASANGOUDA | IND | 254 | 0.3% |
| 6 | SANKANGOUDA VEERABASANAGOUDA SANKANGOUDA | IND | 161 | 0.2% |
| 7 | PRABHAKAR CHANABASAPPA BELLAD | IND | 79 | 0.1% |
| 8 | CHANDRASHEKHARAPPA SHANKRAPPA KUDUR | IND | 70 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (91st), a comfortable margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe17.1%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 15.9% · min 1.9% · max 45.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
79%
lowerhigher
91st of 224How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.78
fewer partiesmore parties
64th of 224How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.6%
lowerhigher
128th of 224Where does the house stand?
SEAT
224 seats · 113 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.78EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 55.2%INC 38.0%OTH 6.8%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
9,90,923
Density
431 / km²
Sex ratio
946 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,298 km²
SC population21.6%
ST population5.3%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
90%HINDU
Hindu 89.9%Muslim 9.3%Other 0.8%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water66.8%
Electricity95.3%
Sanitation79.9%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births100.0%
Children fully vaccinated92.7%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER36.6%
Children underweight (under 5)23.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER44.2%
Women literate83.8%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER14.1%
Clean cooking fuel93.6%
Health insurance34.9%