Back to Jharkhand 2019 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Winner — 2019
SABITA MAHATO
JMM· Mahagathbandhan (Jharkhand)
JMM 29.3%AJSUP 19.7%30 others 51.0%
Votes
57,546
29.3% share
Winning margin
18,710
9.5% of votes
Total candidates
31
Turnout
75.6%
of 2,60,120
A clear win with a 9.5% margin.
Seat history
8 of 31 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.09 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SABITA MAHATO | Mahagathbandhan (Jharkhand) | 57,546 | 29.3% |
| 2 | HARE LAL MAHATO | 38,836 | 19.7% | |
| 3 | SADHU CHARAN MAHATO | NDA | 38,485 | 19.6% |
| 4 | ARVIND KUMAR SINGH | IND | 32,206 | 16.4% |
| 5 | NARAYAN CHANDRA GOPE | IND | 2,798 | 1.4% |
| 6 | GURU PAD MAHATO | IND | 2,237 | 1.1% |
| 7 | VIJAY MAHATO | NDA | 2,011 | 1.0% |
| 8 | BINOD RAY | JVM | 1,839 | 0.9% |
| 9 | KIYAM HUSSIN | IND | 1,496 | 0.8% |
| 10 | BANU SINGH SARDAR | PSPL | 1,461 | 0.7% |
| 11 | JAGDISH CHANDRA MAHATO | IND | 1,329 | 0.7% |
| 12 | BYAS DEV MAHATO | AMB | 1,325 | 0.7% |
| 13 | PRAVESH KUMAR | 1,269 | 0.7% | |
| 14 | SEKH AKHIRUDDIN | JKP(N) | 1,157 | 0.6% |
| 15 | ANAND GOPE | IND | 1,117 | 0.6% |
| 16 | BISHNU KALINDI | IND | 1,073 | 0.6% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 1,072 | 0.5% |
| 18 | SHAILENDRA MAHATO | NDA | 906 | 0.5% |
| 19 | LEKHNATH NISHAD | IND | 870 | 0.4% |
| 20 | NEPAL KISKU | SUCI(C) | 846 | 0.4% |
| 21 | SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH | IND | 789 | 0.4% |
| 22 | DHANESHWAR MAHATO | 773 | 0.4% | |
| 23 | DOMAN CHANDRA MANJHI | APoI | 720 | 0.4% |
| 24 | AGNI BARDHAN SINGH | 697 | 0.3% | |
| 25 | PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH | IND | 658 | 0.3% |
| 26 | AMBUJ KUMAR | NAGADHP | 549 | 0.3% |
| 27 | RANJIT MAHATO | 511 | 0.3% | |
| 28 | SAMR KUMAR | IND | 503 | 0.3% |
| 29 | JITENDRA THAKUR | IND | 471 | 0.2% |
| 30 | NIRMAL KUMAR MAHATO | RAIM | 460 | 0.2% |
| 31 | ASIM KUMAR | AHNP | 413 | 0.2% |
| 32 | SANTOSH KUMAR | BHAZS | 306 | 0.2% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
High turnout (5th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean9.5%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.1% · min 8.3% · max 23.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
79%
lowerhigher
5th of 81How crowded is the field?
SEAT
4.76
fewer partiesmore parties
2nd of 81How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.6%
lowerhigher
63rd of 81Where does the house stand?
SEAT
81 seats · 41 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
4.76EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JMM 29.3%AJSUP 19.7%BJP 19.6%IND 16.4%OTH 14.5%NOTA 0.5%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
8/31
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.09 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
15,02,338
Density
208 / km²
Sex ratio
1005 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,224 km²
SC population3.8%
ST population67.3%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
63%OTHER
Other 63.0%Hindu 28.2%Christian 5.8%Other 3.0%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water9.9%
Electricity40.7%
Sanitation11.8%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births67.9%
Children fully vaccinated87.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER60.6%
Children underweight (under 5)62.4%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER72.6%
Women literate47.8%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER24.4%
Clean cooking fuel15.5%
Health insurance46.7%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Custard Apple
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.