Back to Chhattisgarh 2013 map
Winner — 2013
KERABAI MANHAR
BJP· BJP (NDA)
BJP 44.6%INC 35.9%12 others 19.5%
Votes
81,971
44.6% share
Winning margin
15,844
8.6% of votes
Total candidates
13
Turnout
81.9%
of 2,24,718
A clear win with a 8.6% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
14 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KERABAI MANHAR | BJP (NDA) | 81,971 | 44.6% |
| 2 | PADMA GHANSHYAM MANHAR | UPA | 66,127 | 35.9% |
| 3 | KU. KAMDA JOLHE | BSP | 22,470 | 12.2% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 3,319 | 1.8% |
| 5 | MANGAL | IND | 1,729 | 0.9% |
| 6 | PILA RAM ANANT | IND | 1,590 | 0.9% |
| 7 | DHANESH RAM CHOUHAN | IND | 1,540 | 0.8% |
| 8 | AD. UDHORAM KOSHALEY | NPEP | 1,355 | 0.7% |
| 9 | DHANKA NIRALA | IND | 805 | 0.4% |
| 10 | SARITA | BASMM | 751 | 0.4% |
| 11 | RAMKUMAR AJAGALLE | SUSP | 677 | 0.4% |
| 12 | MAHARU RAM JOLHEY, ADVOCATE | Samajwadi Party | 661 | 0.4% |
| 13 | DR.CHHABILAL RATRE | BHDC | 574 | 0.3% |
| 14 | NANDLAL MAHILANE | CSP | 403 | 0.2% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (40th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean8.6%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.8% · min 6.8% · max 27.0%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
80%
lowerhigher
40th of 90How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.38
fewer partiesmore parties
39th of 90How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.1%
lowerhigher
46th of 90Where does the house stand?
SEAT
90 seats · 46 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.38EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 44.6%INC 35.9%BSP 12.2%OTH 5.5%NOTA 1.8%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
14,93,984
Density
211 / km²
Sex ratio
991 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,086 km²
SC population15.1%
ST population33.8%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
95%HINDU
Hindu 95.3%Other 4.7%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water19.7%
Electricity82.2%
Sanitation19.3%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births87.7%
Children fully vaccinated90.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER39.1%
Children underweight (under 5)28.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER62.2%
Women literate74.9%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.5%
Clean cooking fuel29.8%
Health insurance66.3%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.