Back to Chhattisgarh 2008 map
Winner — 2008
DOCTOR SHAKRAJEET NAYAK
INC· INC (UPA)
INC 48.9%BJP 40.1%12 others 11.0%
Votes
72,054
48.9% share
Winning margin
12,944
8.8% of votes
Total candidates
14
Turnout
77.2%
of 1,90,941
A clear win with a 8.8% margin.
Seat history
3 of 14 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.02 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
14 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DOCTOR SHAKRAJEET NAYAK | INC (UPA) | 72,054 | 48.9% |
| 2 | VIJAY AGRAWAL | NDA | 59,110 | 40.1% |
| 3 | HANSRAM SAHU | BSP | 5,019 | 3.4% |
| 4 | PRAMOD KUMAR SING | IND | 3,128 | 2.1% |
| 5 | RADHESHYAM SHARMA | IND | 2,665 | 1.8% |
| 6 | RAJESH TRIPATHI | IND | 1,532 | 1.0% |
| 7 | MAHAVEER GURUJI | IND | 1,485 | 1.0% |
| 8 | TATHAGAT SHRIVASTAVA | IND | 693 | 0.5% |
| 9 | RAJESH JAIN | 367 | 0.3% | |
| 10 | PARIMAL YADAV | NDA | 346 | 0.2% |
| 11 | NARAYANDAS INKLAB GANDHI | IND | 285 | 0.2% |
| 12 | NARENDRA KUMAR CHOUBEY | IND | 283 | 0.2% |
| 13 | BHUWANLAL PATEL(ADHIVAKTA) | CSP | 269 | 0.2% |
| 14 | AMULYA PUJARI | IND | 221 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (45th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean8.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.2% · min 6.3% · max 31.5%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
79%
lowerhigher
45th of 90How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.00
fewer partiesmore parties
88th of 90How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.4%
lowerhigher
79th of 90Where does the house stand?
SEAT
90 seats · 46 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.00EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 48.9%BJP 40.1%OTH 11.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
3/14
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.02 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
14,93,984
Density
211 / km²
Sex ratio
991 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,086 km²
SC population15.1%
ST population33.8%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
95%HINDU
Hindu 95.3%Other 4.7%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water19.7%
Electricity82.2%
Sanitation19.3%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births87.7%
Children fully vaccinated90.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER39.1%
Children underweight (under 5)28.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER62.2%
Women literate74.9%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.5%
Clean cooking fuel29.8%
Health insurance66.3%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.