Back to Bihar 1990 map
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 53 · 1990
Paru
Winner — 1990
VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH
IND
IND 37.2%IND 26.4%30 others 36.5%
Votes
48,200
37.2% share
Winning margin
14,019
10.8% of votes
Total candidates
32
Turnout
73.2%
of 1,77,037
A clear win with a 10.8% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 48,200 | 37.2% |
| 2 | NITISHWAR PD. SINGH | IND | 34,181 | 26.4% |
| 3 | BAIJ NATH PD. YADAV | IND | 27,589 | 21.3% |
| 4 | SUDHAKAR PD. SINGH | National Front | 7,273 | 5.6% |
| 5 | MAHESHWAR PD. SINGH | INC | 6,250 | 4.8% |
| 6 | ANIL KUMAR | BJP | 1,731 | 1.3% |
| 7 | CHANDRA SHEKHAR PD. SINGH | IND | 656 | 0.5% |
| 8 | BHUPENDRA MISHRA | IND | 488 | 0.4% |
| 9 | RAMCHANDRA PD. SINGH | IND | 487 | 0.4% |
| 10 | RAMNARESH PANDEY | 470 | 0.4% | |
| 11 | KISHORI THAKUR | IND | 336 | 0.3% |
| 12 | HARDEV PD. SINGH | IND | 277 | 0.2% |
| 13 | RAJ MANGAL OJHA | SOP(L) | 271 | 0.2% |
| 14 | GULAM GOUS | 163 | 0.1% | |
| 15 | SUDARSHAN SHARMA | IND | 160 | 0.1% |
| 16 | RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD | IND | 160 | 0.1% |
| 17 | KOUSHAL KU. SINGH | IND | 117 | 0.1% |
| 18 | KRISHNA DEVI | IND | 110 | 0.1% |
| 19 | JAYANTI SHARMA | IND | 91 | 0.1% |
| 20 | INDESHWAR SINGH | BKUS | 89 | 0.1% |
| 21 | LAKSHMIKANT SINGH | IND | 69 | 0.1% |
| 22 | HARI MADHO SINGH | IND | 63 | 0.1% |
| 23 | GANPAT SINGH | IND | 60 | 0.1% |
| 24 | SHATRUDHAN SAHANI | IND | 59 | 0.1% |
| 25 | MOHAN PD. SHAHI | IND | 50 | 0.0% |
| 26 | UMAKANT SINGH | IND | 50 | 0.0% |
| 27 | ASHARFI SINGH BASANPURI | IND | 48 | 0.0% |
| 28 | SATENDRA NARAIN SINGH | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
| 29 | DURGA SINGH | IND | 32 | 0.0% |
| 30 | BHUP NARAIN SINGH | IND | 31 | 0.0% |
| 31 | BIMAL KUMAR | IND | 28 | 0.0% |
| 32 | MITHILESH KU. YADAV | IND | 24 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (3rd), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean10.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.7% · min 2.1% · max 45.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
82%
lowerhigher
3rd of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.59
fewer partiesmore parties
10th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.5%
lowerhigher
157th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.59EFFECTIVE PARTIES
IND 37.2%IND 26.4%IND 21.3%JD 5.6%OTH 9.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
16,90,400
Density
897 / km²
Sex ratio
950 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,884 km²
SC population6.7%
ST population3.8%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
68%MUSLIM
Muslim 68.0%Hindu 31.4%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.3%
Electricity17.5%
Sanitation10.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births54.6%
Children fully vaccinated67.3%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER38.8%
Children underweight (under 5)41.1%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER65.1%
Women literate48.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER36.6%
Clean cooking fuel15.3%
Health insurance8.1%
What's nearby?
1 locationSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Dragon Fruit🏺Pineapple🏺Tea
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.