Back to Bihar 1980 map
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 115 · 1980Reserved (SC)
Kumarkhand
Winner — 1980
NAWAL KISHORE BHARTI
JNP(SC)
JNP(SC) 49.5%INC(I) 26.6%7 others 23.8%
Votes
30,894
49.5% share
Winning margin
14,294
22.9% of votes
Total candidates
9
Turnout
52.0%
of 1,19,949
Kumarkhand is a safe seat — NAWAL KISHORE BHARTI won by 22.9%.
Seat history
All Candidates
9 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAWAL KISHORE BHARTI | JNP(SC) | 30,894 | 49.5% |
| 2 | JAIKRISHNA HAZARA | Congress (I) | 16,600 | 26.6% |
| 3 | DAIDYA NATH PASWAN | Left | 8,257 | 13.2% |
| 4 | KAMLESHWARI PASWAN | BJP | 1,761 | 2.8% |
| 5 | JANAK RAM | 1,561 | 2.5% | |
| 6 | RAM CHARITRA PASWAN | IND | 1,384 | 2.2% |
| 7 | GULAB PASWAN | IND | 854 | 1.4% |
| 8 | CHHATHU RISHIDEO | JNP(JP) | 813 | 1.3% |
| 9 | ANUP LAL PASWAN | IND | 227 | 0.4% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (188th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe22.9%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 20.2% · min 0.1% · max 44.3%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
63%
lowerhigher
188th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.56
fewer partiesmore parties
121st of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.4%
lowerhigher
48th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.56EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JNP(SC) 49.5%INC(I) 26.6%CPM 13.2%OTH 10.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
39,51,862
Density
1496 / km²
Sex ratio
954 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,641 km²
SC population12.0%
ST population0.9%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
89%HINDU
Hindu 89.5%Muslim 10.3%Other 0.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water4.3%
Electricity14.8%
Sanitation21.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births73.0%
Children fully vaccinated72.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER39.7%
Children underweight (under 5)45.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER62.8%
Women literate65.6%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER26.2%
Clean cooking fuel36.8%
Health insurance9.4%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.