Back to 1991 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · PC 9 · 1991
Vaishali
Winner — Lok Sabha 1991
SHEO SHARAN SINGH
JD· Janata Dal
JD 54.2%INC 37.0%35 others 8.7%
Votes
3,46,003
54.7% share
Winning margin
1,09,843
17.4% of votes
Total votes cast
6,37,893
Candidates
37
Seat history
All Candidates
37 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHEO SHARAN SINGH | 3,46,003 | 54.7% | |
| 2 | USHA SINGH (W) | 2,36,160 | 37.4% | |
| 3 | SHYAM NARAIN THAKUR | 16,503 | 2.6% | |
| 4 | VALENDRA PD. SINGH | JP | 13,306 | 2.1% |
| 5 | LAKHENDRA RAI | IND | 9,368 | 1.5% |
| 6 | SHEO SHANKER SINGH | IND | 2,537 | 0.4% |
| 7 | PULISH MAHTO | IND | 1,634 | 0.3% |
| 8 | KRISHNA KU. SAH | 758 | 0.1% | |
| 9 | ASHARFI SAHANI | IND | 647 | 0.1% |
| 10 | JAYANTI SINGH RATHOUR (W) | IND | 618 | 0.1% |
| 11 | RADHIKA DEVI (W) | IND | 442 | 0.1% |
| 12 | GOVARDHAN LAL | IND | 423 | 0.1% |
| 13 | BISHUNI BHAGAT | IND | 340 | 0.1% |
| 14 | BASUDEO BHAGAT | IND | 331 | 0.1% |
| 15 | ABBAS KHAN | IND | 324 | 0.1% |
| 16 | KAUSHAL KISHORE VIKAL | BKUS | 293 | 0.1% |
| 17 | KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH (PHULWARIA) | IND | 275 | 0.0% |
| 18 | RAM SAGAR SINGH | IND | 248 | 0.0% |
| 19 | NAVIN KUMAR | IND | 239 | 0.0% |
| 20 | RANJAN KUMAR SHARMA | IND | 229 | 0.0% |
| 21 | MITHLESH KUMAR | IND | 175 | 0.0% |
| 22 | KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH (GIDHA) | IND | 169 | 0.0% |
| 23 | CHANDRIKA KUAR | IND | 161 | 0.0% |
| 24 | GANPAT SINGH | IND | 145 | 0.0% |
| 25 | MAULVI ALAM | IND | 137 | 0.0% |
| 26 | RUP NARAYAN BHAGAT | IND | 136 | 0.0% |
| 27 | JITENDRA | IND | 103 | 0.0% |
| 28 | BABAN SINGH | IND | 80 | 0.0% |
| 29 | SAIYED MAHAMAD SOIB | IND | 80 | 0.0% |
| 30 | VINOD DUBEY | IND | 62 | 0.0% |
| 31 | OM PRAKASH SINGH | IND | 57 | 0.0% |
| 32 | SAHBAN KHAN | IND | 55 | 0.0% |
| 33 | MAHIM NARAN SINGH | 54 | 0.0% | |
| 34 | N.K.P.S. SARWPRATHAM |  FBL | 51 | 0.0% |
| 35 | RAM NARAYAN MISHRA | IND | 45 | 0.0% |
| 36 | AJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY | IND | 41 | 0.0% |
| 37 | RAM KISHORE SINGH | IND | 33 | 0.0% |
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (6th), a closer-than-average contest, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean17.4%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.9% · min 0.9% · max 71.3%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
62%
lowerhigher
6th of 40How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.25
fewer partiesmore parties
35th of 40How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.1%
lowerhigher
35th of 40How often does it back the winner?
SEAT
neveralways
matches the ruling party
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.25EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 54.7%INC 37.4%OTH 7.9%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
28,11,569
Density
993 / km²
Sex ratio
921 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,830 km²
SC population13.6%
ST population1.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
57%HINDU
Hindu 56.7%Muslim 43.0%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.5%
Electricity7.7%
Sanitation9.4%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births66.2%
Children fully vaccinated61.6%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.9%
Children underweight (under 5)47.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER67.9%
Women literate43.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER52.0%
Clean cooking fuel15.2%
Health insurance19.5%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Jute🏷️MakhanaGI
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.