Back to Andhra Pradesh 2009 map
Andhra Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 65 · 2009
Goshamahal
Winner — 2009
M MUKESH GOUD
INC· INC (UPA)
INC 45.5%BJP 28.8%16 others 25.7%
Votes
55,829
45.5% share
Winning margin
20,488
16.7% of votes
Total candidates
18
Turnout
59.3%
of 2,07,026
Goshamahal is a safe seat — M MUKESH GOUD won by 16.7%.
Seat history
1 of 18 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.08 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
18 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M MUKESH GOUD | INC (UPA) | 55,829 | 45.5% |
| 2 | PREM SINGH RATHORE | NDA | 35,341 | 28.8% |
| 3 | G S BUGGA RAO | TDP | 19,882 | 16.2% |
| 4 | G MADHAVI DEEPAK | PRAP | 5,442 | 4.4% |
| 5 | HEMANTH KUMAR JAISWAL | LSP | 2,088 | 1.7% |
| 6 | U BAAL SAILOO | TPPP | 895 | 0.7% |
| 7 | DEVILALJI BHUTADA | BSP | 723 | 0.6% |
| 8 | SYED AZIZ | IND | 718 | 0.6% |
| 9 | P RENUKA | IND | 389 | 0.3% |
| 10 | RISHI RAM | IND | 224 | 0.2% |
| 11 | B YELLESH | IND | 199 | 0.2% |
| 12 | B RAMCHANDER | IND | 194 | 0.2% |
| 13 | SHAIKH IBRAHIM | IND | 187 | 0.1% |
| 14 | RAJASHEKAR CHILLAM PALLY | IND | 151 | 0.1% |
| 15 | MOHD. NAWAB | IND | 149 | 0.1% |
| 16 | NARESH SINGH | IND | 136 | 0.1% |
| 17 | M. B. RAGHUNATH | IND | 112 | 0.1% |
| 18 | B NARENDRA | IND | 100 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (157th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe16.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 15.8% · min 2.4% · max 38.3%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
72%
lowerhigher
157th of 175How crowded is the field?
SEAT
1.86
fewer partiesmore parties
171st of 175How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.7%
lowerhigher
118th of 175Where does the house stand?
SEAT
294 seats · 148 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
1.86EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 45.5%BJP 28.8%TDP 16.2%OTH 9.5%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
1/18
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.08 Cr
This seat number was reused from 2014. The district and local data on file describe the seat as contested from 2014, so they are not shown for earlier elections.