Back to Andhra Pradesh 2009 map
Andhra Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 59 · 2009
Amberpet
Winner — 2009
G. KISHAN REDDY
BJP· BJP (NDA)
BJP 49.4%INC 26.6%14 others 24.0%
Votes
59,134
49.4% share
Winning margin
27,243
22.7% of votes
Total candidates
16
Turnout
59.3%
of 2,02,014
Amberpet is a safe seat — G. KISHAN REDDY won by 22.7%.
Seat history
1 of 16 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.37 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | G. KISHAN REDDY | BJP (NDA) | 59,134 | 49.4% |
| 2 | MOHD. FAREEDUDDIN | UPA | 31,891 | 26.6% |
| 3 | G.SRINIVAS GOUD | PRAP | 9,742 | 8.1% |
| 4 | K.JAGDISHWAR | TRS | 7,264 | 6.1% |
| 5 | C. VINOD YADAV | LSP | 6,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | KRISHNA YADAV.C | Samajwadi Party | 2,996 | 2.5% |
| 7 | SYED FAIYAZ | IND | 443 | 0.4% |
| 8 | DEEPAK KUMAR B. | BSP | 430 | 0.4% |
| 9 | ANDHRAPU SUDARSHAN GANGAPUTRA | 357 | 0.3% | |
| 10 | P.NAGARAJU | BSP(AP) | 328 | 0.3% |
| 11 | MAKAM NIRMALA DEVI | PPOI | 221 | 0.2% |
| 12 | GULAM SAZEED KHAN | SJP(R) | 196 | 0.2% |
| 13 | KURAPATI SRINIVAS RAJU | IND | 175 | 0.1% |
| 14 | TEEGA SATYA NARAYANA MUDIRAJ | IND | 152 | 0.1% |
| 15 | DHATRAKU CHANDULAL PATEL | IND | 127 | 0.1% |
| 16 | JANAGAM RAJ KUMAR | IND | 110 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (122nd), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe22.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 16.8% · min 2.8% · max 36.7%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
81%
lowerhigher
122nd of 175How crowded is the field?
SEAT
1.98
fewer partiesmore parties
152nd of 175How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.6%
lowerhigher
154th of 175Where does the house stand?
SEAT
294 seats · 148 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
1.98EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 49.4%INC 26.6%PRAP 8.1%TRS 6.1%LSP 5.2%OTH 4.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
1/16
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.37 Cr
This seat number was reused from 2014. The district and local data on file describe the seat as contested from 2014, so they are not shown for earlier elections.