Back to 1996 map
Madhya Pradesh · PC 35 · 1996
Khargone
Winner — Lok Sabha 1996
RAMESHWAR PATTIDHAR
BJP· BJP
BJP 47.4%INC 39.9%30 others 12.7%
Votes
2,86,549
49.3% share
Winning margin
45,207
7.8% of votes
Total votes cast
6,04,964
Candidates
32
Seat history
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESHWAR PATTIDHAR | 2,86,549 | 49.3% | |
| 2 | BODAR SINGH KALU SINGH MANDLOI | 2,41,342 | 41.5% | |
| 3 | RAJINDER SINGH CHAUHAN | AIIC(T) | 9,099 | 1.6% |
| 4 | LAXMAN | IND | 5,151 | 0.9% |
| 5 | MAHESH | IND | 5,038 | 0.9% |
| 6 | KAMAL | IND | 4,803 | 0.8% |
| 7 | BHAI LAL | IND | 4,707 | 0.8% |
| 8 | KISHORE MANGAT DARBAR KISHOR SINGH | IND | 3,078 | 0.5% |
| 9 | KALU RAM MANGI LAL YADAV | IND | 2,505 | 0.4% |
| 10 | VAMAN | IND | 2,465 | 0.4% |
| 11 | LALCHAND | IND | 1,912 | 0.3% |
| 12 | SURESH | IND | 1,835 | 0.3% |
| 13 | RAM PAL | IND | 1,530 | 0.3% |
| 14 | RADHEYSHYAM GAURISHANKAR | IND | 1,430 | 0.3% |
| 15 | RIYAZ ALI | IND | 1,216 | 0.2% |
| 16 | HABIB BEIG HABIB SURUR RAHIM BEIG | IND | 1,200 | 0.2% |
| 17 | SUBHASH | IND | 919 | 0.2% |
| 18 | BIMAL | IND | 826 | 0.1% |
| 19 | ASHOK | IND | 694 | 0.1% |
| 20 | SAI HYDER ALI | IND | 688 | 0.1% |
| 21 | CHANDER PRAKASH | IND | 504 | 0.1% |
| 22 | RADHEY SHYAM NATHU SINGH | IND | 496 | 0.1% |
| 23 | POMADU | IND | 469 | 0.1% |
| 24 | SEELDAR | IND | 463 | 0.1% |
| 25 | SAKILA | IND | 456 | 0.1% |
| 26 | SALIM | IND | 433 | 0.1% |
| 27 | HABIB KHAN | IND | 429 | 0.1% |
| 28 | HUKAM CHAND | IND | 408 | 0.1% |
| 29 | ASLAM CHOUBE ABAS CHOUBE | IND | 314 | 0.1% |
| 30 | DILAWAR | IND | 311 | 0.1% |
| 31 | ASRAF KHAN | IND | 234 | 0.0% |
| 32 | RAM DASS | IND | 194 | 0.0% |
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
An essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean7.8%
— NOT REPORTEDmean 9.2% · min 3.1% · max 15.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
60%
lowerhigher
How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.09
fewer partiesmore parties
How much NOTA?
SEAT
— NOT REPORTEDHow often does it back the winner?
SEAT
neveralways
matches the ruling party
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.09EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 49.3%INC 41.5%OTH 9.3%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDHistorical constituency — last contested in 1999. Redrawn or abolished in a later delimitation, so it has no present-day district or state context; its full territorial history is above and in the Seat-history drawer.