Back to 1996 map
Andhra Pradesh · PC 40 · 1996
Khammam
Winner — Lok Sabha 1996
VEERABHADRAM TAMMINENI
CPM· United Front
CPM 41.8%INC 34.8%26 others 23.4%
Votes
3,74,675
42.8% share
Winning margin
63,291
7.2% of votes
Total votes cast
8,95,441
Candidates
28
Seat history
All Candidates
28 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VEERABHADRAM TAMMINENI | 3,74,675 | 42.8% | |
| 2 | P.V. RANGAIAH NAIDU | 3,11,384 | 35.6% | |
| 3 | NAGESWARA RAO KONERU | NTRTDP(LP) | 75,072 | 8.6% |
| 4 | SADINENI VENKATESWARLU | IND | 45,749 | 5.2% |
| 5 | JAYACHANDRA REDDY REDDYVARI | 28,823 | 3.3% | |
| 6 | PADIGA YERRAIAH | IND | 7,022 | 0.8% |
| 7 | BHUKYA LINGAIAH | IND | 5,172 | 0.6% |
| 8 | GANGISARPA SANKAR | IND | 4,172 | 0.5% |
| 9 | CH. JOGA RAO | IND | 3,642 | 0.4% |
| 10 | THOTAMALLA CHANDRASEKHARA | IND | 2,677 | 0.3% |
| 11 | GUNTUPALI PAPAIAH | IND | 2,001 | 0.2% |
| 12 | GANDURI LALAIAH | IND | 1,697 | 0.2% |
| 13 | KHADAAR ALI SAYYAD | AIIC(T) | 1,467 | 0.2% |
| 14 | CHIRRA VENKATESWARLU | IND | 1,386 | 0.2% |
| 15 | PORANKI VENKATA RAJU | IND | 1,223 | 0.1% |
| 16 | MD. GALIB | IND | 1,173 | 0.1% |
| 17 | MANGAPATI NALAJALA | IND | 1,143 | 0.1% |
| 18 | PILLA JAGADISH NAIDU | IND | 1,072 | 0.1% |
| 19 | MYLAVARAPU MALLIKHARJUNA RAO | IND | 796 | 0.1% |
| 20 | AKARAPU PRABHU LINGACHARY | IND | 729 | 0.1% |
| 21 | NAGANDLA JANAKI RAMA RAO | IND | 654 | 0.1% |
| 22 | MADAKAM MUTYALU | IND | 595 | 0.1% |
| 23 | BOINAPALLI VENKATRAO | IND | 576 | 0.1% |
| 24 | BANOTH BIKNA | IND | 501 | 0.1% |
| 25 | PULLAREDDY BHEEM REDDY | IND | 466 | 0.1% |
| 26 | BHEEMJI NAIK | IND | 410 | 0.1% |
| 27 | SARVAR MOHIUDDIN | IND | 398 | 0.1% |
| 28 | BANOTH LAXMA NAIK | IND | 326 | 0.0% |
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
A two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean7.2%
— NOT REPORTEDmean 10.1% · min 0.8% · max 29.6%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
79%
lowerhigher
How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.39
fewer partiesmore parties
How much NOTA?
SEAT
— NOT REPORTEDHow often does it back the winner?
SEAT
neveralways
matches the ruling party
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.39EFFECTIVE PARTIES
CPM 42.8%INC 35.6%NTRTDP(LP) 8.6%IND 5.2%OTH 7.8%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDHistorical constituency — last contested in 2004. Redrawn or abolished in a later delimitation, so it has no present-day district or state context; its full territorial history is above and in the Seat-history drawer.